First mathematical analyses have been accomplished using descriptive analytics including brand new reliability of your own strategies, imply scores and you will percentages.

To decide hence subscale are included in the regression study, a relationship anywhere between the aspect away from sexting and its subscales try presented. People rather associated sext expectancy subscale try as part of the regression to determine whether or not it forecasts the fresh subscales of sexting inspiration questionnaire (Intimate motives, System Image Support, Instrumental/Annoyed Reasons) and sexting choices.

Subsequently, we presented linear regression involving the Social network Addiction and you can sexting points to test all of our hypothesis, similar to the literature [eleven,forty five,46,47], one to an advanced out of habits predict a higher higher interest so you can sext.

Fundamentally, doing new model and you can make certain if your behavioral/mental difficulties additionally the protective strategy got a role inside the sexting, we held separate linear regressions between your internalizing/externalizing subscales out-of Childhood/Adult Notice Report, Factor step one and you may Basis 2 out-of REM-71 and you will SBQ, SMQ, Sq. The latest analyses was basically held having fun with SPSS software (Variation 21.0, IBM, Armonk, New york, USA).

step three.step 1. Sexting Motivations, Conclusion and you may Expectancy

As regards the descriptive analyses concerning sexting motivations and sexting behavior, males have a higher score in almost all sexting dimensions except sexual purposes in which females have a slightly higher score (Table 1). However, conducting several ANOVAs we found that the only significantly different dimension is that of sexting behaviors where males have a higher score (SBQ score: female M = 33.8; male M = 36.5, p < 0.05,>

In addition, ANOVAs were conducted between males and females on sexting expectations. The results show a significance for two subscales of the Sexpectancies Questionnaire: negative expectations about sending sexts ( p < 0.001,>

The correlation analyses between the SMQ, SBQ and SQ have shown the results summarized in Table 2. Briefly, positive expectations of sending are strongly related to all dimensions of sexting, motivational and behavioral (respectively: p < 0.001>

Consistent with the study of Currin , we conducted regressions between SMQ, SBQ as regressors and SQ as a predictor. The detailed results in Table 3 show that sexting behavior is predicted only by positive expectations of sending ( p < 0.001,>

The check for multicollinearity in every regression in the present paper was conducted by examining the Variance Inflation Factor (VIF). Conventionally, as suggested by Cohen and O’Brien , VIF values greater than 4–10 generally indicate severe multicollinearity. Our results are VIF < 3,>

3.dos. Social network Dependency and you may Sexting

Of analysis towards social networking dependency (female: Yards = 14.0 and you can DS = 5.59; male: Meters = several.8 and you may DS = 5.10), the brand new ANOVA anywhere between men and women did not let you know one statistically significant difference between the two communities.

In summary, you’ll claim that a higher level away from societal mass media dependency can lead to a lot more determination to help you sext and participate more often within the sexting choices.

step 3.step three. Internalizing/Externalizing Dilemmas, Protective Method and you can Sexting

As regards the descriptive analyses on Youth/Adult Self Report and REM-71, the only statistically significant differences between males and females are given below. It emerges that females have higher levels in internalizing scales on youth/adult self-report ( p < 0.001,>

Secondly, we wanted to test our hypothesis that immature defensive strategies correlated with a more problematic type of sexting, such as instrumental/aggravated or body image reinforcement. To do this, we considered the two factors of REM-71 in correlation to each dimension of sexting motivations and behaviors. Correlation analysis found no significant relationship between sexting and factors 1 and 2 of REM-71. For this reason, from an exploratory perspective, we decided to investigate the individual subscales of REM-71, maintaining a more kissbrides.com avgörande länk conservative p -value ( p < 0.01).>