step three. Performance

Desk step 1 depicts brand new prevalence of each of risks of the study, according to the level of seriousness located. Likewise, they shows this new reviews between the withdrawals away from children on the some other dangers. Total, the players exactly who exhibited nothing wrong ranged ranging from % who’d no problems which have problematic Internet sites explore and up so you can 83.4% that has no problems which have on line grooming. We keep in mind www.datingranking.net/tr/hitwe-inceleme that the range of moderate and serious troubles ranged anywhere between 4% having sexting and 17% getting problematic Sites play with. 9% out-of moderate/big troubles as well as in cyberbullying, they attained 13.7%. New wavelengths based in the various other quantities of dilemmas had been usually higher for girls compared to males.

Dining table 1

Frequency of every of the risks as a function of new seriousness of your own situation for the total sample and of gender.

In this regard, significant differences were also found between boys and girls in the mean total scores of cyberbullying victimization (Welch’s t = ?2.02, p < 0.043, d = 0.07), online grooming (Welch's t = ?3.51, p < 0.001, d = 0.12) and problematic Internet use (Welch's t = ?2.07, p < 0.039, d = 0.07). In these cases, the mean scores were higher for girls than for boys. There were no significant differences in the rest of the risks: cyber dating abuse victimization (Welch's t = ?1.9, p < 0.058, d = 0.12) and sexting (Welch's t = 0.94, p < 0.410, d = 0.03).

Regarding the type of school (private and public), significant differences were only found in the risks of online grooming (t = ?3.37, p < 0.001, d = 0.13) and sexting (t = 3.8, p < 0.001, d = 0.15). The mean scores were higher in public schools than in private schools in both cases.

In terms of the educational stage (1st–2nd grade of CSE, 3rd–4th grade of CSE and Post-secondary Education), statistically significant differences were found for the risks of cyberbullying victimization (p < 0.002), online grooming (p < 0.001), sexting (p < 0.001) and problematic Internet use (p < 0.001). The scores were higher in 3rd–4th grades, except for online grooming victimization, where higher scores were found in Post-secondary Education (see Table dos ).

Table 2

Differences just like the a function of informative phase (1st–second, 3rd–fourth grades from CSE and you may Article-second Studies) from the dangers (n = 3212, with the exception of the outcome out-of cyber dating abuse that have letter = 1061).

Note: Yards = arithmetic imply; SD = practical departure, F = Welch’s-F, p = significance; ? dos = eta squared.

Dining table step three reveals brand new correlations between the some risks. Them had positive and you will extreme correlations with each other, to your relationships ranging from cyberbullying victimization and you will cyber relationships victimization updates away. Websites risks which have an intimate role (online grooming and you can sexting) was extremely correlated. Generally, new correlations was basically higher to own people in the most common of one’s dangers, apart from the newest matchmaking between cyber relationship victimization and brushing and you will between tricky Websites play with and you can cyberbullying victimization, on the web grooming and you will sexting.

Table step three

Note: The correlations for boys are shown below the diagonal and for girls above it. All correlations are significant at p < 0.001. M = arithmetic mean; SD = standard deviation.

Desk cuatro merchandise the fresh new comorbidities one of the individuals Internet dangers related so you’re able to private telecommunications (cyberbullying victimization, cyber matchmaking discipline victimization, sexting and online brushing). Just the players which finished all the items regarding the risks related in order to victimization (letter = 1109) were believed (i.elizabeth., reducing about study those who had no spouse). Of one’s left players, 60.7% presented a minumum of one of analysed risks (n = 674). The risk on higher private prevalence was cyberbullying victimization (%), followed closely by on the internet brushing. The most common several-chance combos was in fact cyberbullying victimization-on the internet brushing and you can cyberbullying-sexting. We focus on the three-exposure mixture of cyberbullying-sexting-brushing victimization. Fundamentally, 5.49% of victimized adolescents shown every risks conjointly.